Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Esculapio. 2014; 10 (1): 31-34
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-193274

ABSTRACT

Objective: to assess the outcome of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine injection in terms of post-operative pain [visual analogue score] and duration of hospital stay [in hours] in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy


Material and Methods: in this study, a total of 150 patients were recruited after fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria to assess the outcome of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine injection in terms of post-operative pain [visual analogue score] and duration of hospital stay [in hours] in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy


Results: most of the patients were between 41-50 years of age, mean age was 39.76+2.31, 44% [n=66] male and 56% [n=84] females. Stay at hospital [in hours] after laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed the 8.67% [n=1 3] stayed <9 hours, 89.33% [n=134] 9-18, 2% [n=3] 18- 24 hours and no patient with >24 hours, 8.67% [n=13] had excellent, 89.33% [n=134] had good and only 2%[n=3] had fair outcome [pain relief]


Conclusion: the assessment of outcome of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine injection in terms of post-operative pain [visual analogue score] and duration of hospital stay [in hours] in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is found considerably good and may be promoted for use in routine clinical practices to make laparoscopic cholecystectomy more safe and effective

2.
Esculapio. 2014; 10 (2): 83-87
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-193288

ABSTRACT

Objective: to compare open and closed haemorrhoidectomy for wound healing time, hospital stay and complications


Material and Methods: sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for this study and divided into two groups. Group A was treated by open haemorrhoidectomy and group B by closed haemorrhoidectomy. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for wound healing time, hospital stay, early and late complications


Results: the mean wound healing time in closed haemorrhoidectomy group was 2.60+/-0.67 weeks. The mean wound healing time in op n haemorrhoidectomy group was 3.97+/-0.76 weeks. There were 2 [6.7%] patients of urinary retention in closed haemorrhoidectomy group and no patient in open haemorrhoidectomy group. There were 29 [96. 7%] patients of mild to moderate bleeding and 1 [3.3%] patient of severe bleeding in closed haemorrhoidectomy group. In open haemorrhoidectomy group, 1[3.3%] patient had no bleeding, 28 [93 .3%] patients had mild to moderate bleeding and 1 [3.3%] patient had severe bleeding. Among late complications at one month follow up, 1 [3.3%] patient developed anal stenosis in closed haemorrhoidectomy group. In open haemorrhoidectomy group there was 1 [3.3%] patient of anal stenosis and 1 [3.3%] patient of anal fissure


Conclusion: open haemorrhoidectomy has more reliable wound healing with lesser complications, though complete wound healing time is more as compared to the closed technique

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL